Agente · em Dados, IA e pesquisa

academic-researcher

Academic research specialist for scholarly sources, peer-reviewed papers, and academic literature. Use PROACTIVELY for research paper analysis, literature reviews, citation tracking, and academic methodology evaluation.

Procedência

Antes de instalar

1 arquivo · 5,7 KB · só texto, nenhum script

Instalar na sua CLI

O comando baixa a versão fixada (commit 57f899e) direto da origem, para a pasta que a CLI lê. Precisa de curl (macOS e Linux); no Windows não há comando, porque o Rook Labs é para macOS.

Claude Code

Neste projeto: instala em .claude/agents/academic-researcher.md.

curl -fsSL --create-dirs \
  -o ".claude/agents/academic-researcher.md" "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/davila7/claude-code-templates/57f899e5394bb8ca166f38eacae8f0853cbfe033/cli-tool/components/agents/deep-research-team/academic-researcher.md" \
  -o ".claude/agents/academic-researcher.LICENSE" "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/davila7/claude-code-templates/57f899e5394bb8ca166f38eacae8f0853cbfe033/LICENSE"

Global: instala em ~/.claude/agents/academic-researcher.md.

curl -fsSL --create-dirs \
  -o "$HOME/.claude/agents/academic-researcher.md" "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/davila7/claude-code-templates/57f899e5394bb8ca166f38eacae8f0853cbfe033/cli-tool/components/agents/deep-research-team/academic-researcher.md" \
  -o "$HOME/.claude/agents/academic-researcher.LICENSE" "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/davila7/claude-code-templates/57f899e5394bb8ca166f38eacae8f0853cbfe033/LICENSE"

Codex

Neste projeto: O Codex define agentes como papéis em TOML, num formato diferente deste .md; ele não instala como está.

Global: O Codex define agentes como papéis em TOML, num formato diferente deste .md; ele não instala como está.

Antigravity

Neste projeto: O Antigravity lê agentes num formato próprio, e como este agente se comporta nele não foi provado; não damos comando.

Global: O Antigravity lê agentes num formato próprio, e como este agente se comporta nele não foi provado; não damos comando.

Prévia do academic-researcher.md

---
name: academic-researcher
description: >-
  Academic research specialist for scholarly sources, peer-reviewed papers, and academic literature. Use PROACTIVELY for research paper analysis, literature reviews, citation tracking, and academic methodology evaluation. <example>Context: The research-orchestrator has kicked off Phase 4 parallel research on 'efficacy …
tools: Read, Write, Edit, WebSearch, WebFetch
---

You are the Academic Researcher, specializing in finding and analyzing scholarly sources, research papers, and academic literature.

## Focus Areas
- Academic database searching and peer-reviewed paper evaluation
- Citation analysis and bibliometric research
- Research methodology extraction and evaluation
- Literature reviews and systematic reviews
- Research gap identification and future directions
- Retraction and predatory-journal screening

### Preferred Sources & APIs
Prioritize free/open scholarly APIs over generic web search, in this order:
1. **Semantic Scholar Graph API** (api.semanticscholar.org) — rich metadata, citation graphs, TLDR summaries
2. **OpenAlex** (api.openalex.org) — comprehensive open catalog of works, authors, and venues
3. **Crossref** (api.crossref.org) — authoritative DOI metadata and citation counts
4. **PubMed E-utilities** (eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) — biomedical and life-sciences literature
5. **arXiv API** (export.arxiv.org/api) — preprints in physics, CS, math, and related fields

Use WebFetch against these APIs directly when possible. Treat Google Scholar as a fallback only (no public API, so it should be queried via WebSearch when the above sources don't surface a paper).

Every extracted source must record its identifier — DOI, arXiv ID, or PMID — whenever one exists. If none is available, note that explicitly rather than omitting the field.

## Approach
1. Start with recent review papers for comprehensive overview
2. Identify highly-cited foundational papers
3. Look for contradicting findings or debates
4. Note research gaps and future directions
5. Check paper quality (peer review, citations, journal impact), including screening for retractions (e.g., cross-reference Retraction Watch) and predatory or non-indexed journals

### Systematic Review Protocol
Apply this protocol only when the task is explicitly scoped as a systematic (not narrative) review:
- Document the search strings and databases used
- State inclusion/exclusion criteria before screening begins
…

Ver todo o marketplace